Who’s blocking Freedom of Information?

Some quarters, including the media, are blaming President Noynoy Aquino or PNoy for the long delay in the passage of the Freedom of Information (FOI) bill. They say the FOI’s main obstruction is P-Noy’s fear, uneasiness, reluctance, or passivity.

Some politicians in the House of Representatives then use this as an excuse not to act on FOI, killing it softly, ostensibly to protect the President and gain his favor.

Take this story from Interaksyon,com (16 January 2013), which reinforces the above perception. The title is: “With time running out, PNoy remains passive on FOI.” Really? Read the article; the author of the story, Dexter San Pedro, quotes PNoy’s remarks:

“’Well, tatanungin nga natin, ilang araw na lang natitira sa session ng Kongreso pagpasok. ‘Di ba, proseso nila ‘yan. Naibigay na namin ang inputs namin sa FOI. Ang pagkaintindi ko’y matatanggap ’yung mga amendments na minungkahi namin so hinihintay na namin ‘yung finished na output [There are only a few session days left for Congress. But that is their process, right? We have already given our inputs on the FOI. Our understanding is that they have accepted the amendments that we have proposed so we are waiting for the finished output].”’

PNoy’s statement above should by now dispel any doubt about his desire to have the FOI passed. FOI was his election campaign promise. The FOI is a crucial element of the administration’s open government program (OGP).

The expression of Malacañang commitment to FOI is found in its inputs and amendments to the Congress bill. In fact these have been incorporated into the House’s FOI bill, sponsored by Representative Erin Tañada and others. The House bill reflects and upholds the Malacañang view on FOI. The House bill is essentially the Malacañang bill.

The perception that PNoy is passive about FOI or even resistant to it is thus dead wrong. Yes, he has concerns about the misuse of government information (understandable in light of attempts of vested interests to use any means to undermine the credibility of his reforms) and the threat to national security (understandable in light of the tense maritime disputes between the Philippines and China). But the FOI bill approved by the Senate and the bill pending in the House have amply addressed these concerns.

PNoy is now signaling Congress to act on FOI. To repeat and paraphrase what PNoy said: Malacañang is done with the amendments and inputs for FOI and have submitted them to Congress. Congress has accepted accepted them. We are waiting for Congress to make the final output, which is the passage of the bill. So to the House leadership, just do it!

Yet what has the House leadership done? The opposite of what PNoy wants it to do. It has not calendared the FOI, which has been approved by the House’s Public Information Committee, for the plenary debate.

Each session day is critical. Only nine sessions days remain before Congress adjourns, and by then everyone will be attending to the elections.

Not calendaring the FOI for discussion means only one thing: The House leadership is sabotaging the FOI. It cannot even accommodate a debate on the FOI.

We anticipate the leadership’s excuse. Speaker Sonny Belmonte and Majority Floor Leader Boyet Gonzales will tell the FOI champions in Congress that they are doing PNoy a favor by not having FOI passed. They will announce to everyone that they are trying their best to pass FOI, but there’s not enough time to have it passed.

All this is BS. Speaker Belmonte, also known as SB, will be made accountable for the non-passage of the FOI in this Congress. SB cannot use as an excuse the lack of time because he and Boyet Gonzales have used all the tricks to delay its passage. Moreover, it will be ugly and awful for SB and his followers to use PNoy as the excuse for failing to pass FOI.

We applauded SB before, for despite the intense pressure from his peers in Congress, he facilitated the impeachment of former Chief Justice Corona and the approval of important controversial bills, namely the sin tax reform and reproductive health (or responsible parenthood).

But it will be a great tragedy for SB if it turns out that he is the main obstacle to FOI. Let not his record be stained; let it not be him who causes embarrassment to PNoy, Malacañang and Congress. Ultimately, SB must act to move forward the FOI and prevent this disaster from happening.

Filomeno S. Sta Ana III

Sta. Ana coordinates Action for Economic Reforms (www.aer.ph)

  • UPnnGrd

    A most worrisome item about Persidfente Noynoy is why he would want Binay or BongBong (or whoever next sits in Malakanyang) to have the authority –without need of court approval– to listen to judges or senators or Tulfo, Palatino, or Rappler-reporters (or Gokongwei’s or Lucio Tan’s lawyers and accountants) as these people are on cellphones or other devices that can do messaging or e-mail.

    Of course, Presidente Noynoy should have this authority because he is impeccable (child of former presidfent, yey!!!!). But why can’t PersiNoyNoy see that he will not be in Malakanyang beyond 2016 so the next persi-dente’s can then do eavesdropping as PersiNoy wants to do now?

  • That is encouraging. FOI would seal the Aquino drive for good governance into government practices. It goes beyond the “transactions” of jailing the corrupt. FOI will allow the watchful public to have a more assertive role in pressing for good use of money and good deeds. I hope it comes to pass. President Aquino is emerging as the true, modern national hero. No need to look way back to Rizal for pride in good ideals. Aquino has both good ideals and accomplishments.

    • UPnnGrd

      Really??? PersiNoynoy is a Jose Rizal?????

      • Not in an artistic sense or intellectual sense. Rizal WANTED to change the nation to be compassionate and serve the people, rather than the corrupt few. Aquino IS changing the nation. One was desire, felt to the soul of the people, the other is accomplishment. Which is more heroic?

  • GabbyD

    first, what happened to the website yesterday?

    second, why does the legislature care about pnoy’s feelings, assuming that they are right. dont they have an independent legislative agenda?

    this is another reason why parties over individuals are so important.

    individuals allow people to pass blame on others. nothing gets done.